As of Friday's market close of $164.05, AAPL is trading at a 15.1x multiple on my next-twelve-months EPS estimate (12.0x when excluding next-12m net cash and div).
I decided to challenge myself by posting my final estimates nearly two months instead of the usual two weeks or so before the report because the events during these two months (keynote, launch, ramp, and report) appear to be some of the most influential for Apple in years, with significant details like precise launch timing, product pricing, reception and supply sufficiency, all helpful in correctly estimating the final few days of Fiscal 2017, the initial shape of the much hyped 2018 supercycle, and a first glimpse into the sort of tough compare arguments looking into 2019 that inevitably will be raised as soon as Q1 guidance is provided (in fact this has already been happening).
It may seem counter-productive to attempt estimates before all the critical events and information are in the past and can get digested and distilled into my model. Why not just do as usual and incorporate it all in mid October? There'd be absolutely no risk to the accuracy of my final estimates by waiting. On the contrary, coming out early leaves the forecast at the mercy of some of my most subjective, perhaps some conservative, others more hopeful, and possibly even a few strained assumptions. Like, what if the launch is on the last two days of Q4 and not the week before? Or what if Apple announces record-smashing pre-orders or sales that would clearly call for adjustments in both Q4 and Q1 numbers? Or if the event disappoints some tech pundits who take it to the interwebs with rage against Apple? (Ok that one's a given, of course.) Maybe some manufacturing glitch turns up in early October and phones start blowing up in flames? OMG! (Even though Samsung came out nearly unscathed from that, Apple would be crucified. But no, that won't happen.) Or, they call it the iFacePhone? *facepalm*
But seriously, why not get all the possible facts available before the report? Well, that's precisely what I wanted to test about my model and assumptions, and no better opportunity than these two months before this special supercycle. I wanted to test the value of those assumptions and whether the forecast is fragile or robust against uncertainty, when lacking the objective factual details, but rather based on relatively consistent yet subjective patterns, perceptions, hunches, and usually vague but pretty sensible (and most essential IMO) notions of management style, strategy, priorities, and cultural values. Patterns, hunches, and notions which I hardly ever share or explain at length (and I still won't) because opinions are cheap and thus only the most facile, snarky, clickbait-ish, or plain-out nasty are the ones that get attention (helped by both its proponents and detractors), and there's never any accountability for all this incredibly prolific but wasteful punditry. Even the hard cold, mostly non-opinionated sell-side analyst numbers looking forward 1 or 2 years are never judged or even tested after the facts are known, with the latest single-quarter revisions shouldering the sole opportunity for establishing any confidence in the cacophony of pivotal, usually existential, long-term judgments and predictions.
Oops, a bit of a tangential rant there. Anyway, if I think I can somehow model Apple's business 2-3 years or even further in advance and hope to do it somewhat reliably, it would only be thanks to precisely this kind of intuitive grasp of the company, and not just by being knowledgeable about the launch date or the exact pricing or the silly name or the precise unlocking mechanism of the premium phone. Much less by carefully monitoring how far WS analysts raise their estimates right up to the day of the report so one can align guesses around or just ahead of their herd-like behavior. No, the added value I aim to provide is not attained by waiting to collect all the info possible and after all the events and knowable facts are known, only then produce an estimate, the best-informed one can produce. Because contrary to what financial reporting (even the good bits out there) would suggest, the goal is not at all to come up with the best prediction for the latest three-month period, which in fact has minimal influence on the stock's valuation. Instead, it's to somehow develop a picture as realistic as possible of what the next 5-10 years will look like, this indeed representing the bulk of an investment's intrinsic value. So, my insights (or lack thereof) into that longer-term future can only be appreciated when I'm forced into baking-in some hunches and hopefully a lot of educated guesses into the model, and once some short-term events and outcomes that actually depend on some of these assumptions are revealed one may be able to assign the proper level of confidence for those longer-term projections which do inform the value of a company.
Ok enough justification on this crazy silly guessing game. In any case, I'll do whatever, and you should always do your own work, never assume I'm here to do it for you. In fact, assume I'm just trying to have fun. And nothing's more fun and rewarding than trying to guess the end-of-year stuff well before everything gets revealed, just like the joy of Christmas and Santa is all about basking in the build-up of expectations and the thrill of surprises.
Sorry for the long philosophical dissertation. On this specific forecast (see below), seems WS analysts should rise Q1 consensus once they see guidance, which will likely make them raise the rest of the year in tandem, up until the end of January when Q2 guidance is given. Then, that Q2 guidance could come as a slight miss (Q2-Q4 expectations already somewhat elevated well before a hypothetical reaction to Q1 guidance upside) and trigger a healthy reset on those expectations. Or perhaps I'm just a bit low and all will be good. We'll have to wait and see how these dynamics play out in October and January.
I'll spare you any additional commentary on the current and next quarters as there would be too much to cover, except for this which last time I promised to reiterate: Fiscal 2019 consensus estimates of at least mid single-digits growth seem key for continued stock appreciation. Those will be publicly available in financial sites after Q4 gets reported (likely on Oct 31). Of course, Dec quarter guidance given that same day is immensely important, but everyone already knows this. Right? Ok. Just remember to also get a peek at 2019 estimates then, and maybe allow a couple weeks for analysts' model updates to trickle through the data services to see how these evolve early on.
Remember, those 2019 expectations will be the basis of a "tough compare" bearish case brought up against Apple, just as in the 2015 top, and unless tax reform gets passed or double-digit growth from the supercycle prolongs into 2019 (a reasonable possibility), it'll surely play a role against investor's confidence in the company's mid-term prospects.
3mo ending Sep-2017 Rev($M) GM(%) EPS($) ------------------- ------- ----- ------ Analysts consensus 51,090 - 1.88 Apple guide low 49,000 37.5 1.75* Apple guide high 52,000 38.0 1.93* My estimates 51,574 38.1 1.92 (5.19b shares) 3mo ending Dec-2017 Rev($M) GM(%) EPS($) ------------------- ------- ----- ------ Analysts consensus 86,860 - 3.83 Apple guide low (e) 85,000 38.0 3.69* Apple guide high(e) 87,000 39.0 3.91* My estimates 87,349 39.4 3.98 (5.13b shares) *EPS guidance ranges derived from other figures provided by Apple and diluted shares outstanding estimated by me 12m ending Sep-2018 Rev($M) EPS($) ------------------- ------- ------ Analysts consensus 261,980 10.88 My estimates 259,669 10.88 Valuation (fwd-12mo from) EPS($) Y/Y 10x Cash* Div Tot ------------------------- ------ ---- --- ---- ---- --- Trailing (Oct-2016) 9.04 9% 90 29 2.40 122 Fair Value (Oct-2017) 10.88 20% 109 31 2.64 143 1yr Target (Oct-2018) 11.46 5% 115 36 2.96 154 * Cash per share balance net of long-term debt
F4Q17 Revenue breakdown: iPhone 30,041 (47.5 × $632) iPad 4,541 (10.5 × $432) Mac 6,666 (5.05 × $1,320) Services 7,548 Other 2,742 ( 3.0 × $391 = 1,172 Watch) Income statement: Revenue 51,574 COGS (31,928) GM 19,647 38.1% OpEx ( 6,784) OpInc 12,863 24.9% OIE 505 Pre-tax 13,368 Tax ( 3,409) 25.5% NetInc 9,959 19.3% Shares 5,189 EPS $1.92 (amounts in millions except $ASP, $EPS, and ratios%)